first informed those who were at yesterday's meeting of the mediators' mediation project near dish, just above the results: first, the scale has been decided the other an analysis of responses from media lawyers from the ends and internal court mediation was presented.
During the other evening we worked on three specific Medaitionsfällen:
The first case went to affectionate Media settlers, the day stop even after the conclusion of mediation, the mediator in the form of emails to date. The concern of the mediator was to deal with this situation properly. The collegial consultation brought next to the reflection on the role of a mediator's recommendation, to ensure clarity, with different solutions to the situation were discussed.
The second case involved a blockade in mediation, ends of the media will not open and have secrets from each other, have presented those concerns but after each of the meetings of the mediator. In addition to specific recommendations for dealing with such situations (eg, metaphor, stories, provocative or surprising interventions, sometimes doing something completely different, ask what brought the clients to mediation today, what they like about the other, etc.) was also here primarily to clarify the extent to feel the mediator responsible for the results of mediation and has a distance to the clients.
was our third case, the concern of a mediator, to review their role in family mediation. This described us first examine the case and had to take it outside of the district court. The rest of us then expressed in a first round of our personal feelings and then called our current hypotheses and fantasies of what is heard. Thereafter, the protagonist again brought into the circle and gave the group feedback, which was helpful for them and what is not.
The evening was once again so exciting that we have almost an hour covered, without realizing it ...
0 comments:
Post a Comment